3 ms·
It's meh for a language, it's simple which is what they are trying to achieve but it all comes with trade offs like all programming languages. I would say a lar
by nwmcsween 5y ago
It's meh for a language, it's simple which is what they are trying to achieve but it all comes with trade offs like all programming languages. I would say a large portion of a language is how you mesh with the syntax and tooling around it.
- theshrike79 5y agoGo being "meh" is one of its best parts. It doesn't encourage you to do fancy language tricks, it kindly directs you to get your shit done, compiled and delivered.