5 ms·
Yes, all these disparate databases can be merged together and you can get a pretty darn accurate picture of me. But so what, what is the end game here?
by oramit 5y ago
Yes, all these disparate databases can be merged together and you can get a pretty darn accurate picture of me.
But so what, what is the end game here?
- vineyardmike 5y ago> But so what, what is the end game here? Police obviously love this data, and when its being traded in open market it is sold without a warrant. Laws change, if your a minority or in an oppressive country, data is scary. In real terms for most white americans who don't break laws, the "slippery slope" (or shifting baseline) is already getting bad for end users. .. I interviewed for a job at an insurance company. They said they offer a car plug in that tracks your car (to know if you're risky driver) to "offer discounts on good driving". They said in interview (not publicly) about 4% of people get discounts and the rest stay the same or go up. They gets tons of data on how people drive to tune their models. They also said that some neighborhoods are now considered more dangerous because they saw other drivers in their data being dangerous. Basically you now pay more because they know you live near other bad drivers, or bad drivers go to the grocery store near you, or whatever. They also said (in 2018) they are working on an app to show you an id card (and track you in your car if you don't want their dongle). They're very interested in data on where you go and how you use your car, for obvious reasons. I don't know if they do this, but they could easily buy data on where you shop to determine if the path from your home to the store has dangerous intersections that might raise your premiums. That is an easy use for grocery store data that will have clear downsides to most people.