Again, this is an ad-hom. I didn't claim something was true because Greenwald believes it - I linked to an article addressing the topic, so you can address the

Again, this is an ad-hom. I didn't claim something was true because Greenwald believes it - I linked to an article addressing the topic, so you can address the content of that article, rather than its author. > He quit his job at the intercept because they wouldn't let him publish conspiracy garbage ... unless he could provide some sort of proof doesn't seem to match up with > just because the guy died of a stroke afterward doesn't mean it wasn't caused indirectly by being blasted in the face by bear mace where's the proof? various outlets already back-peddled on the claim he was hit in the head with a fire extinguisher, they have yet to prove anything with regards to bear mace (other than two men carried it). "Prosecutor: Bear spray not used in Capitol attack on officers, defendants seek bond" -- https://wtop.com/dc/2021/04/men-charged-in-jan-6-bear-spray-attack-on-officers-at-us-capitol-seek-bond/ https://wtop.com/dc/2021/04/men-charged-in-jan-6-bear-spray-... > Even if his death was completely unrelated, it doesn't make Jan 6 any less of an insurrection. You stated an officers death as evidence of the level of violence. I don't believe this was true, and I think it does make it less of an insurrection.