> Sorry, I don't understand your argument. Understood. It’s worth noting that the definition of a model that you said you were using doesn’t match with typica

> Sorry, I don't understand your argument. Understood. It’s worth noting that the definition of a model that you said you were using doesn’t match with typical definitions of a formal model. You aren’t talking about formal models, and I accept that you are only thinking in terms of economic models. Perhaps that explains where the difference in understanding lies.