Yes, that is what I'm saying doesn't make sense. If those reasons hold up, then all of bait-and-switch advertising is legal to do - which is obviously not the c

Yes, that is what I'm saying doesn't make sense. If those reasons hold up, then all of bait-and-switch advertising is legal to do - which is obviously not the case. Unless the ruling is saying that bait-and-switch advertising is only ok when its "obviously a joke". I don't really think it was that obvious in the pepsi case tho.