OP specifies repetition of phrasing, not just the facts themselves, implying some degree of "coaching"/collusion or a common source (i.e. non-independence). >

OP specifies repetition of phrasing, not just the facts themselves, implying some degree of "coaching"/collusion or a common source (i.e. non-independence). > then you better go find and listen to the crackpot insisting it's a cube OP never implied this, this is a strawman intended to cheaply dismiss the point. > I wonder why I am perceived as arrogant and tedious? ^ followed by a personal attack..