That might be, but your counter argument is not showing that you seriously engage with the most common criticism (including in this article), which is that ther

That might be, but your counter argument is not showing that you seriously engage with the most common criticism (including in this article), which is that there is no sane business model for them to adjust towards. It's not that they are losing money now, it's that subsidizing rides to be below cost is the only real differentiator they have. Their only apparent endgame is being able to monopolize the market and then extract rents further down the line. And that's something that needs to be called out over and over again so lawmakers and regulators don't enable them.