3 ms·
I wouldn't take the page too seriously: it's more of a silly meme than anything. It's kind of a hyperventilating, pseudo-schizophrenic conspiracy theory rant ab
by rrrrrrrrrrrryan 5y ago
I wouldn't take the page too seriously: it's more of a silly meme than anything. It's kind of a hyperventilating, pseudo-schizophrenic conspiracy theory rant about how the government is printing too much money how should go back to the gold standard, but it does show that a ton of stuff changed in big ways in the 70s that may have contributed to The Great Decoupling [1] (wages decoupling from productivity gains).
While this page emphasizes the big macroeconomic changes and the changes to global banking, a greater contributor was probably the massive socio-political changes of the early 70s:
- Unions saw their power begin to erode (leading to less bargaining power for workers)
- Women entered the workforce en masse (households with dual incomes may be willing to put up with lower individual salaries if they still come out ahead)
- The USSR began sputtering out (leading to a political backlash against many forms of collectivism)
- Globalization started ramping up (a new glut of cheap labor)
- Software started taking hold (automation of jobs, etc)
Unfortunately there's not one simple, easy-to-explain reason that we can point to, but it is a strange phenomenon that we should work hard to correct if we want to live in a stable, peaceful society.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decoupling_of_wages_from_productivity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decoupling_of_wages_from_produ...
- BLKNSLVR 5y agoIt was initiated as a justification for Bitcoin, I believe, so there's a certain silly meme-ness to it, definitely. But it doesn't change the fact it provides valuable information about the changing economic landscape. I'm not wanting to point at Bretton-woods singularly, or even necessarily as a major reason, hence my saying 'economics is complex beast'. Reaganomics[0] is another factor in the overall fabric. I'm primarily trying to point out that this little 'blip' of inflation right here right now is a mere extension of the last 40-odd years, and anyone saying that "this dip in real wages is also transitory" exists firmly on the 'investment returns' rather than 'labor provision' side of the economics equation. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaganomics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaganomics