4 ms·

One would assume that if you have the resources to attempt to build something that resembles a helicopter, you would have a way to source a cloth strip to tie y

One would assume that if you have the resources to attempt to build something that resembles a helicopter, you would have a way to source a cloth strip to tie yourself to the seat. Not trying to diminish the magnitude of the disaster, but I think your argument does not apply in this case

trhway 5y ago
sorry, i think you don't get it - the point is that you don't have all the necessary things. Which things out of the missing things were really necessary - that is rearview 20/20. This time it was strip of cloth, other time it may be something else.
- sokoloff 5y ago
  I think there’s a counterpoint which is “while you may not have everything, it seems wise to use those things you do have.” I cannot fathom that a person with the skills, resources, and tenacity to DIY a helicopter could not lay their hands on at least a car seatbelt and a scooter helmet during the course of the project. I wouldn’t be surprised if the crash scene was within sight of both of those items. “Aviation in itself is not inherently dangerous. But to an even greater degree than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of any carelessness, incapacity or neglect.”
- svrtknst 5y ago
  It's also not just a strip of cloth - it's a decent strip of cloth, fasteners, nuts, bolts, washers, something to fasten the seatbelt etc. Which isn't a lot and I think this is an unfortunate oversight, but I can see it being a bit difficult to do properly. Of course, doing it improperly with a rope would probably have been better than not at all.
- jjk166 5y ago
  If you don't have all the necessary parts for your helicopter, you shouldn't be trying to fly it. Maybe there are things that you don't truly need, but this is a terrible way to figure which.
jobigoud 5y ago
I think they were saying for the cause of the accident, not the seat belt part.

trhway 5y ago

sorry, i think you don't get it - the point is that you don't have all the necessary things. Which things out of the missing things were really necessary - that is rearview 20/20. This time it was strip of cloth, other time it may be something else.

sokoloff 5y ago
I think there’s a counterpoint which is “while you may not have everything, it seems wise to use those things you do have.” I cannot fathom that a person with the skills, resources, and tenacity to DIY a helicopter could not lay their hands on at least a car seatbelt and a scooter helmet during the course of the project. I wouldn’t be surprised if the crash scene was within sight of both of those items. “Aviation in itself is not inherently dangerous. But to an even greater degree than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of any carelessness, incapacity or neglect.”
svrtknst 5y ago
It's also not just a strip of cloth - it's a decent strip of cloth, fasteners, nuts, bolts, washers, something to fasten the seatbelt etc. Which isn't a lot and I think this is an unfortunate oversight, but I can see it being a bit difficult to do properly. Of course, doing it improperly with a rope would probably have been better than not at all.
jjk166 5y ago
If you don't have all the necessary parts for your helicopter, you shouldn't be trying to fly it. Maybe there are things that you don't truly need, but this is a terrible way to figure which.

jobigoud 5y ago

I think they were saying for the cause of the accident, not the seat belt part.