I get it, but if the author means a different thing, then they should link to a source that actually defines what they mean (and that I myself could not find, e

I get it, but if the author means a different thing, then they should link to a source that actually defines what they mean (and that I myself could not find, except for the mention of modular programming), instead of to the Wikipedia article that refers to what we have been talking about here. As it stands, what they link to, and what most seem to understand as structured programming, was not a fad at all.