3 ms·
Just knowing the SSN and their address shouldn't be considered sufficient to verify someone's identity. Banks could easily require one to show multiple forms o
by u801e 5y ago
Just knowing the SSN and their address shouldn't be considered sufficient to verify someone's identity.
Banks could easily require one to show multiple forms of identification in person at one of their branches in order to apply for credit.
- zo1 5y agoAnd then the identity thieves will just have to fake those. What's next, calling your landlord for a reference and asking them to send a photo of you to check that it matches the photo you submitted? The goal posts are guaranteed to move.
- u801e 5y agoWith passports and real id standard driver's licenses along with other photo ID, I imagine it would be a lot more difficult for a fraudster to open a line of credit in someone else's name in person as easily as they could do now.
- 542354234235 5y ago>And then the identity thieves will just have to fake those. Are you really just handwaving being able to make fake passports or fake government issued identification cards, as if that is basically the same as just knowing someone’s SSN and a couple other pieces of information about them? What a ridiculous argument. ID cards are required to have multiple security features to prevent reproduction without highly specialized equipment, to prevent altering or tampering with existing cards, and to have multiple ways of detecting counterfeiting or altering of cards. There is no “what’s next” because identification cards are already incredibly secure.
- zo1 5y agoNo, I am a big advocate of offloading the security/verification to the government. I.e. National ID Cards, which are definitely hard to fake and I agree with you fully. The person I was responding to mentioned "multiple forms of identification". At the moment (and I could be wrong) some of these valid forms of identification are things that can be bootstrapped, faked or social-engineered into getting relatively easily. E.g. municipal bills, driver's licenses, birth certificates issued from hospitals, etc. (e.g. look at here for UK https://www.hsbc.co.uk/help/banking-made-easy/help-us-identify-you/ https://www.hsbc.co.uk/help/banking-made-easy/help-us-identi... ). Once you get one of those, you can with effort start acquiring more and more of those other ones. And they would all be 100% legitimate and not fake, which is the crux of the "identity theft" problem, as you can't prove who you are even with real documents as the other person has real ones too! I guess I used the term "fake" in my original response a bit loosely. Point is, we're skirting around the real issue. We have no "chain of proof" or "evidence" from the time you were born to the point in time that you have to start using your identity for formal things. It's all based on layers and layers of multiple people, possibly incorrectly, "vouching" for you by saying you are who you say you are. Even with secure identification cards, there is still a huge potential for fraud which happens a lot even in countries that have national ID cards. E.g. https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2020-08-28-home-affairs-official-arrested-for-selling-birth-certificates/ https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2020-08-28-hom...
- 542354234235 5y agoThis doesn’t really feel like a real problem in first world countries. While it is possible to get a drivers license or birth certificate fraudulently, it is definitely not easy. And each step of the way, you are taking a huge risk of being found out and facing severe punishment, especially since many of these forms of ID require to see you in person, and take/verify your picture or other biometrics (passports, driver’s license, biometric residence permit, national identity card, etc). It is a huge amount of time and effort, where you are exposing a significant amount of your own biometric information, in order to commit some sort of financial crime using that identity. That is orders of magnitude more risky and more difficult than using some pieces of information you stole off the internet to commit a financial crime, also over the internet, without exposing any biometric information about yourself. Then, when the “real” person asserted the falsehood of your identity, regardless of your real ID cards, it would still be easily provable that you were not the real person. For instance the real person could have their parents verify their identities and certify that the birth certificate you both have a copy of is legitimately tied to the real person and not you. Unlike now, where you can just walk away from some fake accounts and internet information, there is biometric data linking you to multiple serious crimes. Is it something that could happen, and probably does? Sure. Is it something that would happen even 1% as often as identity theft related financial crimes happen under the current system? Absolutely not. It feels like the current problem is banks being robbed because they are storing their money in a cabinet next to the glass front door, and you are arguing that if banks build vaults and security systems that bank robbers will just bring huge industrial drills with diamond coted bits to break into the vault over multiple hours while bypassing the security system. Sure, they could do that, but bank robberies will still drop to almost nothing compared to before.