4 ms·
This argument is simply wrong. You could use the same type of "progression" to get, at the root, basic theoretical physics or pure math. Yet, ideas and concep
by aroberge 15y ago
This argument is simply wrong. You could use the same type of "progression" to get, at the root, basic theoretical physics or pure math. Yet, ideas and concept from these two fields are not patentable.
- bfe 15y agoBut his examples are all physical embodiments that perform a tangible real-world function. There's no continuous progression between those and pure math.