Now you’re trying to weasel your way out with ad hominems. - the article suggests storytelling as a way to increase your funding chances. - you say that’s stu

Now you’re trying to weasel your way out with ad hominems. - the article suggests storytelling as a way to increase your funding chances. - you say that’s stupid and needs to be solved - I say it seems like a good idea if you want founders to be able to sell - you say that’s not valid, giving, of all possibilities, Google as an example of how storytelling is unnecessary, regardless that (1) you don’t know how good they are in it and (2) they obviously were very successful in fundraising, the very topic of the article (did you even read it?) You also claim they did not tell their customers about what their product is, yet you also claim that their product was enough to keep them growing, apparently unbeknownst to their customers. I don’t know man, if you can make sense of your arguments, good for you.