3 ms·
I know this just drags out the point--sorry for that--but your reasoning is based on a false statement. You reason that "Since there was no appeal...", but in p
by freeopinion 5y ago
I know this just drags out the point--sorry for that--but your reasoning is based on a false statement. You reason that "Since there was no appeal...", but in point of fact, there was an appeal.
Consider this my pedantic contribution to a discussion about a pedantic case.
- SkittyDog 5y agoYou got me there, yep... So that means a Federal appellate court also disagreed? Not sure what what stage of the appeal process he got to, so I dunno if that strengthens the argument or what.