4 ms·
That’s not true, all serious devices (except maybe IoT crapware) implement privacy extensions, so your computers and devices make requests from different, rando
by stephen_g 5y ago
That’s not true, all serious devices (except maybe IoT crapware) implement privacy extensions, so your computers and devices make requests from different, randomised address (within your allocated subnet obviously).
- saurik 5y agoThey don't make literally every single request from a different address off a fully shared prefix (as if you just randomize the final bits but also maintain some unique prefix bits, you still lost), so it is still worse than IPv4 with NAT, much worse than CGNAT, and AFAIK in most cases isn't much (if at all) better than assigning everyone a unique sticky address.