3 ms·
For 99.9% of use cases, that's a solved problem. You'll never use anything other than FLAC and Opus for lossless and lossy compression respectively. I'm sure t
by NavinF 5y ago
For 99.9% of use cases, that's a solved problem. You'll never use anything other than FLAC and Opus for lossless and lossy compression respectively.
I'm sure there are unusual cases such as live streaming over satellite internet where getting an extra 1% compression on high quality audio is a big deal, but even that's likely a temporary problem. Starlink users already get >50mpbs
- ugjka 5y agoI'm sure Sirius XM would be interested in something that outperforms AAC v2 by a large margin
- CharlesW 5y ago> You'll never use anything other than FLAC and Opus for lossless and lossy compression respectively. That's true only for if you don't mind losing a substantial portion of your potential audience. In contrast, AAC (including low-bitrate HE-AAC and HE-AACv2 flavors) is ubiquitous as MP3 for anything made in the past 10 years.