Besides from several typos (I was half-asleep at that time), I should have said "that doesn't make stationary arithmetic coding is as useful than stationary Huf

Besides from several typos (I was half-asleep at that time), I should have said "that doesn't make stationary arithmetic coding is as useful than stationary Huffman coding as adaptive arithmetic coding is to adaptive Huffman coding" instead. I really meant that stationary arithmetic coding remains useful but its usefulness is limited.