>Unfortunately your aggressiveness and rudeness make your comment of lower quality than the one you are answering - read https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidel

>Unfortunately your aggressiveness and rudeness make your comment of lower quality than the one you are answering - read https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html to see what site rules you are breaking as well. Betting doesn't make your argument truer, it only points to your own irrationality. Did you not notice the person who replied to me literally just commented a single sentence and left it at that? It's called an unsubstantiated comment and it is also addressed int the rules you link here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html I simply made a bet. There's no aggression here. I like to back up my claims with more seriousness rather then single line comments. Also claiming my post is rude and aggressive when it isn't is in itself rude. I just make claims and I offer to back up my claim with money. Why? I would offer a proof but no proof is known because my answer is: We don't know. >Should you wish to argue that the three body problem can generate true randomness, I think it is your responsibility to refer to links that support your argument Except this is not my wish and I never stated such. My statement is that we don't know if it's deterministic. My offer is that I put money on the fact we don't have any definitive proof we do know. >However the intuition is that any set of equations must be deterministic, Intuition is just hand waving. There is nothing definitive here I'm sorry. My offer stands to the first person that can give me a proof, $1000. That includes you even though I found the first paragraph of your post dishonest and rude. You called me irrational, that's practically an insult and a flagrant violation of the rules. I did no such violation. What's going on here is not that I'm violating the rules. But that you're biased. You disagree with me so your bias senses aggression and violations of rules on my side even though I did no such thing. In fact your bias blinds you to your own violation. You called me irrational. Might as well call me stupid. Same personal insult just disguised with smarter wording.