2 ms·
"You have the privilege to drive a personal car, but if you make yourself a danger to others by drinking and driving, the privilege will be revoked" is a more a
by SECProto 5y ago
"You have the privilege to drive a personal car, but if you make yourself a danger to others by drinking and driving, the privilege will be revoked" is a more apt comparison.
- totony 5y agoYou don't have the right to drive a car (and it's pretty well know e.g. you require a license) in this case. Here people say you have the right to choose what goes in your body and to be treated as a normal person (not a "normal person license" or a "body choice license")
- SECProto 5y agoThese persons still have the right to choose what goes in their body, be it alcohol or vaccine. The choice just has certain consequences on available transportation methods.
- totony 5y agoWhy does exercising your right have consequences? If we go that way, why not just jail them? ("You have a right to choose, but if you do you're going to a quarantine facility")
- cardiffspaceman 5y agoExercising your rights has always had consequences, when your rights involve actions that interfere with the rights of others. The U.S. Supreme Court archives are full of examples and analogies.
- mthoms 5y ago>Why does exercising your right have consequences? Exercising your rights is fine until doing so risks the health and safety of others. Other people have rights too.