2 ms·
>There's a natural limit to what may be achieved with low/no code tool. Kids might be able to drag a few elements on screen to create charts and games, but that
by mhuffman 5y ago
>There's a natural limit to what may be achieved with low/no code tool. Kids might be able to drag a few elements on screen to create charts and games, but that sort of work doesn't really advance the field.
Ahhh, who said the point in the future would be to advance the field? That is how we think. Future generations might be content with a few "programming geniuses" and everyone else making simplistic apps for work for fun.
You could see this future coming. It is already onerous to be a desktop developer on Windows or Mac. It is purposely easier to develop and deploy simplistic mobile apps that can be controlled and monitored by the "stores" that distribute them.
- laurent92 5y agoA bit like today, I feel like a toddler playing with Java coloured cubes, while the “real programmers” are the Linux contributors, people who write drivers and so on. Tomorrow it will be 3 layers: The C programmers, the people from Atlassian or Apple who build the platforms, and us, programming with the subset of the language they give us.
- losethos7 5y agoWhat a bizarre comment. Application platforms like Salesforce and SAP have been around for decades. There is no “tomorrow” about that. That’s yesterday.
- dagmx 5y agoEvery generation has been okay with having multiple tiers of skillsets and domains. That's just natural. Even in the early days of computing, you'd definitely have people split between low level and high level code. The fact is, everytime new technology comes along that reduces the barrier of entry, you're going to have some people who will be lower level developers and many who will be high level due to being able to do things more easily. You can apply this to most consumer friendly domains.