> based on their choices That's the difference. You shouldn't exclude people for characteristics they can't control (like race or disability) or characteristic

> based on their choices That's the difference. You shouldn't exclude people for characteristics they can't control (like race or disability) or characteristics core to their identity (like religious views), but I see no problem with excluding people who choose to behave asocially. > An actual "inclusive" construct would work with people to understand and respect their concerns, and meet them where they are You're free to not get vaccinated, and we have accommodations for those who are unable or unwilling to get vaccinated. How do you see an alternative inclusive approach working?