Oh, I get that. I wrote as much — this scheme needs to expand the planted land indefinitely which is infeasible. And you’re right that it would be more effectiv

Oh, I get that. I wrote as much — this scheme needs to expand the planted land indefinitely which is infeasible. And you’re right that it would be more effective to multiply that effect by using the wood in long-life applications like house construction. All in all, it’s a crappy idea that only serves to greenwash businesses rather than make actual reductions of emissions.