3 ms·
There’s got to be a compromise between having an idea first and disclosing it, having your patent drafters make it as broad as possible such that even you barel
by vmception 5y ago
There’s got to be a compromise between having an idea first and disclosing it, having your patent drafters make it as broad as possible such that even you barely recognize it, and the expectation to have a trillion dollars of capital to attempt making the idea viable
The “trolls” or non practicing entities are just as much a piece of this system as everyone else. The patent inventor has to recoup as $15000 is a lot to them, the trolls have to recoup as their millions of dollars of patent purchases is a lot to them, and the companies that build use unfathomable amounts of capital to build at all and it is ridiculous to suggest the inventor or the NPE do that.
Maybe the government should just buy patents and not leverage them. If there is no comprehensive patent regulatory change people can agree on.
- rtkwe 5y agoNo one owes the inventors or patent companies anything for bad patents. They're meant to do a specific thing and I think we're light years away from that at this point. At least originally with mechanical patents you had the basic working form of the idea but with software patents there's nothing there.
- vmception 5y agookay, since that will never reach consensus the floggings will continue until morale improves I was explaining why people do what they do.