2 ms·
> From society's perspective maybe it's verygoodware. At least in the US, the historical distinction between verygood searches and mal searches is given in the
by throwaway81523 5y ago
> From society's perspective maybe it's verygoodware.
At least in the US, the historical distinction between verygood searches and mal searches is given in the 4th amendment: "no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Of course that has been twisted and stretched before, and this is more of the same. But if literally everything is being scanned, "probable cause" is completely absent from the process. It is a fishing expedition of the exact type that the 4A was designed to prevent.