5 ms·
>attempt to, or assist, authorize or encourage others to circumvent, disable or defeat any of the security features or components that protect, obfuscate or oth
by grawprog 5y ago
>attempt to, or assist, authorize or encourage others to circumvent, disable or defeat any of the security features or components that protect, obfuscate or otherwise restrict access to any Content or Google Play.
Am I reading this correctly in that, this seems to me like just telling people about something like Aurora is against the terms of services and can get you banned whether you use it or not?
As in, even the gp comment technically breaks that rule just by posting that Aurora FAQ?
That's fairly intense if so.
- totony 5y agoUsed to be that all tos were "subjects to change." ToS are mostly just random words anyways
- SomeBoolshit 5y agoAn excellent comment. Terms of service still tend to be mostly words but they matter a lot.
- grawprog 5y agoI've always considered TOS's an abberation of contract law myself. I've had many professional contracts with both private and commercial clients. In none of those cases was I ever allowed to provide a contract where I could just decide whatever I want, whenever I want and the customer is forced to agree otherwise...fuck them...and I still get paid.
- totony 5y agoIt's more akin to guidelines than contract. This is why it's so aberrant to see them get so long and convoluted.
- BrandoElFollito 5y agoThe TOS are subject to change but at least here (France) tout have to be informed about the change and you can leave the contract at no cost of you do not agree.
- lobocinza 5y ago> That's fairly intense if so. Nobody wants to lose his milky cow.