3 ms·
I've never worked with distros targeting enterprise, but I've never encountered a distro that didn't include nano. Even if Vim is "better", I think it's import
by babypuncher 5y ago
I've never worked with distros targeting enterprise, but I've never encountered a distro that didn't include nano.
Even if Vim is "better", I think it's important for all distros to include a text editor that is easy to use out of the box, and nano fits that bill perfectly.
- KronisLV 5y agoIn my experience, the DEB distributions (Debian, Ubuntu, ...) usually have nano by default, whereas the RPM ones (RHEL, CentOS, Oracle Linux, ...) don't. That said, i immensely enjoy how small the install size for nano is and how there's no actual work that you need to do to get started with it (unless you need/want customization, like the author of the original article).
- snowwrestler 5y agoWhen I first started working in Linux, it was in Centos and RHEL and I used nano, since it was already installed and easier to understand than vim. That was about a decade ago though, maybe RHEL has removed nano since then.
- ineedasername 5y agoThat said, i immensely enjoy how small the install size for nano I used to install lynx web browser for the same reason, especially because at the time it was the age of countless popups and swf everywhere. I should check to see how it is these days, but I stopped using it when webdev made many pages unusable in it.