> Most readers will find Gadberry’s readings dazzlingly innovative; other less attentive and open-minded readers may view them as outlandish. This kind of rhet

> Most readers will find Gadberry’s readings dazzlingly innovative; other less attentive and open-minded readers may view them as outlandish. This kind of rhetorical gambit really bugs me. So if I find Gadberry unconvincing (or possibly even full of it) I'm close-minded and inattentive, am I?