The only facts they could debunk would be the truly absurd (e.g. that this smoothie will extend your life by a decade!) Or instances where insufficient evidenc

The only facts they could debunk would be the truly absurd (e.g. that this smoothie will extend your life by a decade!) Or instances where insufficient evidence is used to draw an absolute conclusion. I've seen them actually commit the latter where they fact check a politician's prediction based on an expert projection as if the expert is infallible.