3 ms·
It's less that the argument is heretical, and more that it's based on some false premises. First, it's possible to accept that climate change is a huge (and la
by feoren 5y ago
It's less that the argument is heretical, and more that it's based on some false premises.
First, it's possible to accept that climate change is a huge (and largely man-made) problem, and also believe technology will fix it.
Second, you're talking about a centuries-scale trend about the relationship between technology and energy, and we're talking about the technological breakthroughs that are possible in the next couple decades if we all work together on this important problem. While it may be true that energy begets technology, technology also begets technology.
Thirdly, you seem to be under-estimating how much energy we can actually get from the Sun with today's technology. We have the tech and economic output right now to completely supply our energy demand with the sun within 10-20 years via worldwide solar farms and a trans-continental grid (so the daytime side can provide for the nighttime side). Again, if the entire planet comes together to make that happen. The only thing we don't have is the will. Telling people "we're doomed, it's too late, we'll never have the technology because of this flimsy historical correlation, just lay down and die" harms the global will to fight the problem, rather than helps.