I find it fascinating that science is not performed in a vacuum, it requires the vast breadth of expertise in scientific disciplines, physics, math, and statist

I find it fascinating that science is not performed in a vacuum, it requires the vast breadth of expertise in scientific disciplines, physics, math, and statistics, supported by IT & Engineering. Yet, it those dreaded statistics Pros most often finding flaws in my limited, anecdotal experience I think it is important to think about the different way in which we humans can look at the same data and draw dramatically different conclusions. Although I have views, I like to read contrary opinions for the sake of balance and synthesis. Believe this is different from "bought & paid for" external opinions, although, most organizations need income. So a think-tank, an FFRDC, or Academia are likely equally willing to study a topic and analyze it for funding. Provided you are not dictating conclusions I don't see an issue with it though.