5 ms·

"Purchases that require Google Play's billing system: Digital items, Subscription services, App functionality or content, Cloud software and services" https://

"Purchases that require Google Play's billing system: Digital items, Subscription services, App functionality or content, Cloud software and services" https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/10281818?hl=en https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answ... "Developers charging for apps and downloads from Google Play must use Google Play's billing system as the method of payment. Play-distributed apps must use Google Play's billing system as the method of payment if they require or accept payment for access to features or services, including any app functionality, digital content or goods." https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/9858738?visit_id=637644790590181537-88997355&rd=1 https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answ... Can you explain which of those categories this payment ("The app doesn't provide any special features to people who donate; it's just a way to help support the project.") falls under?

RHSeeger 5y ago
While I understand what you're saying here, I would guess that it's seen as bypassing the intent of the rules, if not their specific wording. If I put an app up on the app store for free, then link to my site and ask for donations, I am effectively using the app store for free. The app in question is effectively setup to say "you don't need to pay for this app, but we would really like you too"... and then the payment is handled outside the play store. Arguing over whether it should be called payment or a donation doesn't really change the fact that is it the user giving money to the developer because of the app; the app they got on the play store. That's the behavior that the rule in intended to avoid.
- jfrunyon 5y ago
  If Google's intent is to ban donations to an app creator, then why does it explicitly say "if they require or accept payment for access to features or services, including any app functionality, digital content or goods"? Frankly it seems to me that the intent of the rules is to specifically allow asking for payment/"donation" outside of Play so long as nothing in your app is affected by it.
  - RHSeeger 5y ago
    I read the intent as disallowing the use of the app store to distribute an app that you make money on, without paying for the use of the app store. It seems as simple as that. And "this app is free, but please come give me money for it" is a way of doing just that.
    - jfrunyon 5y ago
      Again, "if they require or accept payment for access to features or services"
SquishyPanda23 5y ago
The screenshot says that the violation is on the other part of the policy: "Google Play's billing system must not be used in cases where:... payments include peer-to-peer payments, online auctions, and tax exempt donations;" That is, according to the screenshot in the GitHub PR, the app was removed for using the Google Play billing system when they shouldn't be using it. It was not removed for failing to use the Google Play Billing system when they should have been. I have no idea how they might have been using Google Play billing. There is no billing code on GitHub that I see. Maybe they turned on billing on the Play Store accidentally, or maybe the screenshot has the wrong policy violation.

RHSeeger 5y ago

While I understand what you're saying here, I would guess that it's seen as bypassing the intent of the rules, if not their specific wording. If I put an app up on the app store for free, then link to my site and ask for donations, I am effectively using the app store for free. The app in question is effectively setup to say "you don't need to pay for this app, but we would really like you too"... and then the payment is handled outside the play store. Arguing over whether it should be called payment or a donation doesn't really change the fact that is it the user giving money to the developer because of the app; the app they got on the play store. That's the behavior that the rule in intended to avoid.

jfrunyon 5y ago
If Google's intent is to ban donations to an app creator, then why does it explicitly say "if they require or accept payment for access to features or services, including any app functionality, digital content or goods"? Frankly it seems to me that the intent of the rules is to specifically allow asking for payment/"donation" outside of Play so long as nothing in your app is affected by it.
- RHSeeger 5y ago
  I read the intent as disallowing the use of the app store to distribute an app that you make money on, without paying for the use of the app store. It seems as simple as that. And "this app is free, but please come give me money for it" is a way of doing just that.
  - jfrunyon 5y ago
    Again, "if they require or accept payment for access to features or services"

SquishyPanda23 5y ago

The screenshot says that the violation is on the other part of the policy: "Google Play's billing system must not be used in cases where:... payments include peer-to-peer payments, online auctions, and tax exempt donations;" That is, according to the screenshot in the GitHub PR, the app was removed for using the Google Play billing system when they shouldn't be using it. It was not removed for failing to use the Google Play Billing system when they should have been. I have no idea how they might have been using Google Play billing. There is no billing code on GitHub that I see. Maybe they turned on billing on the Play Store accidentally, or maybe the screenshot has the wrong policy violation.