3 ms·
The idea that populism and a lack of trust is bad is interesting, since it is mostly people in the "elite circle" that hold that it is bad, or those that wish t
by ecshafer 5y ago
The idea that populism and a lack of trust is bad is interesting, since it is mostly people in the "elite circle" that hold that it is bad, or those that wish they were. They don't seem to entertain the idea that maybe their expertise is not as strong as they believe. Many people seem to discount ideas that seem "bought and paid" for by an outside organization for example, which is reasonable. If an X studies person is an expert, but I don't believe they have the rigor to actually be an expert, why is it wrong to discount their views?
- OrvalWintermute 5y agoI find it fascinating that science is not performed in a vacuum, it requires the vast breadth of expertise in scientific disciplines, physics, math, and statistics, supported by IT & Engineering. Yet, it those dreaded statistics Pros most often finding flaws in my limited, anecdotal experience I think it is important to think about the different way in which we humans can look at the same data and draw dramatically different conclusions. Although I have views, I like to read contrary opinions for the sake of balance and synthesis. Believe this is different from "bought & paid for" external opinions, although, most organizations need income. So a think-tank, an FFRDC, or Academia are likely equally willing to study a topic and analyze it for funding. Provided you are not dictating conclusions I don't see an issue with it though.