> I'm skeptical that any given bit of research, especially one going against the status quo, will receive much more open consideration than what an authoritaria

> I'm skeptical that any given bit of research, especially one going against the status quo, will receive much more open consideration than what an authoritarian-minded licensing board would do. Peer review is broken. > if a pediatrician in their expert opinion comes to some "crazy" opinion, it seems dangerous to start policing it, as opposed to educating about it. You seem to be opposing regulation of the medical profession. I am not interested in discussing whether we need regulation. The answer is obvious to me: Regulation of the medical profession is necessary for quality of life of people in our society. I am interested in discussing problems of the regulation process. The rest of your comment is whataboutism. Next time you comment, please skip those parts.