3 ms·
> The actual fallacy ... according to linguistics researcher with a website. He sounds like as much a false authority on philosophy as anyone else.
by nostromo 5y ago
> The actual fallacy
... according to linguistics researcher with a website. He sounds like as much a false authority on philosophy as anyone else.
- entropicdrifter 5y agoFrom the Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: 9. The ad verecundiam fallacy concerns appeals to authority or expertise. Fundamentally, the fallacy involves accepting as evidence for a proposition the pronouncement of someone who is taken to be an authority but is not really an authority. This can happen when non-experts parade as experts in fields in which they have no special competence—when, for example, celebrities endorse commercial products or social movements. Similarly, when there is controversy, and authorities are divided, it is an error to base one’s view on the authority of just some of them. (See also 2.4 below.) https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fallacies/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fallacies/
- tomcatfish 5y agoThe point the parent was making is that citing authority isn't a bad thing to do. Citing authorities in _a different field_ often is, though. (Citing a doctor on the common cold is not a fallacy, but citing a doctor on global economics is)
- nostromo 5y agoAnd in doing so they cited a linguist about philosophy. And it doesn’t matter anyway - thankfully we use science now and not philosophy to determine truth.