3 ms·
> why didn't they omit those references and reasoning regarding the Capitol?! Your argument seems to be: Because Snopes didn't omit references in this one case
by spiderice 5y ago
> why didn't they omit those references and reasoning regarding the Capitol?!
Your argument seems to be: Because Snopes didn't omit references in this one case, they don't omit references ever.
I've got no dog in this fight, but please, the logical fallacies are hurting my brain.
- mavhc 5y agoThe lack of evidence is your evidence?
- spiderice 5y agoWhat do you mean "your evidence"? I'm making no claims as to whether or not Snopes omits references. I'm merely pointing out that "My Grandma smokes and she's 100 years old" is not evidence that smoking doesn't kill.
- qkqk 5y ago> I'm making no claims as to whether or not Snopes omits references Good, they clearly do not omit references, thanks for not challenging that! Snopes has debunked hundreds of liberal falsehoods. Same thing as your grandma fallacy, er, example right? Those falsehoods the liberals said about Trump are actually true?
- qkqk 5y ago> the logical fallacies are hurting my brain Like your "they don't omit references ever" straw man? "This one case" meaning one of the most significant and contested events of the US election? Surely their far-left agenda would prevent them from publishing this? This isn't "Ted Cruz is the Zodiac Killer" level of insignificance.