Ideally, articles like this calling out other media outlets for their one sided reporting wouldn't be needed, and especially in this particular case we would be

Ideally, articles like this calling out other media outlets for their one sided reporting wouldn't be needed, and especially in this particular case we would be much better off for it. There is a discussion to be had on this topic, but the article comes off as disingenuous and reads to me like it's just meant as more cannon fodder to rile up a certain crowd than it is about making a point. Rating of the site[1] itself is not what I would consider a trustworthy source for myself and matches my expectations. Saying climate change won't be too bad because the economy will be fine is like saying a traffic accident wasn't so bad because the driver walked away with minor scratches. It's an incomplete picture that disregards all the collateral damage that comes with the situation. Criticizing other outlets that highlight those other aspects because they don't mention or focus on the economy being fine is completely missing the point, and I'm struggling to believe that is anything but intentional. [1] https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/businesslive/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/businesslive/