3 ms·
It's misleading if it implies the plagiariser witnessed, researched, or analyzed an event, when all he did was copy someone else who did those things.
by Veen 5y ago
It's misleading if it implies the plagiariser witnessed, researched, or analyzed an event, when all he did was copy someone else who did those things.
- DFHippie 5y agoWell, if the credibility of the content depends on its having been witnessed or analyzed at all, this should be immaterial.