4 ms·
The numbers come from a YouGov poll [0] as the image in the tweet shows. Also I think it’s funny you link that senate report, because section VI of the report
by jwond 5y ago
The numbers come from a YouGov poll [0] as the image in the tweet shows.
Also I think it’s funny you link that senate report, because section VI of the report is titled “NO EVIDENCE OF CHANGED VOTES OR MANIPULATED VOTE TALLIES”
[0] https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-reports/2018/03/09/russias-impact-election-seen-through-partisan-eyes https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-reports/20...
- Shared404 5y ago> The numbers come from a YouGov poll [0] as the image in the tweet shows. The numbers provide no evidence for the second claim, which means that the twitter post is being intellectually dishonest. > section VI of the report is titled NO EVIDENCE OF CHANGED VOTES OR MANIPULATED VOTE TALLIES And there's not much (or no detectable) evidence of most hacks until suddenly there is. It is not unreasonable to assume a compromised system is compromised. I personally think there probably were not manipulation of the tallies, but I can understand thinking there probably was. There's certainly much more evidence of it than say, Hunter Biden's laptop.