2 ms·
and this being buried at the bottom highlights not a bias but a limitation and challenge of media explaining law to the public, which is there role. What you p
by avs733 5y ago
and this being buried at the bottom highlights not a bias but a limitation and challenge of media explaining law to the public, which is there role.
What you posted is fairly dense and obtuse to someone not in the field...it's technical, and it is abstracted from concrete meaning. So the news article about it used examples. People are now reacting to the examples used in the article, and more examples provided. Rather than the underlying meaning.
This thread is the metapoint.
- guerrilla 5y agoMaybe we should work on elevating just plain literacy while we're at it.
- avs733 5y agoI don't disagree with that but the language, norms, and content knowledge of ANY discioline result in a specific discourse that doesn't necessarily generalize or share easily. It's the reason education folks and STEM folks generally have a hard time talking to each other.