2 ms·
Speculation from a random stranger on the internet, or a study showing results? I'll take the study with the results. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm
by tstrimple 5y ago
Speculation from a random stranger on the internet, or a study showing results? I'll take the study with the results.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7032e1.htm?s_cid=mm7032e1_w https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7032e1.htm?s_cid=mm...
- joshuakelly 5y agoAfter this legitimation crisis, sorry, but articulate strangers are often the best way to "read the headlines upside down" - a necessary fact of life now.
- vaidhy 5y agoThis study talks about reinfection for vaccinated patients and not about reinfection of unvaccinated patients. This does not seem to contradict the parent comment.
- JPKab 5y agoYou might want to look at the multiple peer reviewed studies I posted in a different reply, because you are spreading misinformation. There is a big public health motivation (completely understandable) for why they don't talk much about natural immunity. A lot of people, my lovable but dumb as a rock sister included, who had some symptoms after socializing with people who end up testing positive, who never got the test themselves. They just assume they were infected. We definitely don't want these people to skip the vaccines. But again, managing the behavior of morons is a separate activity from determining the actual truth of the matter.