4 ms·

> She said, “This battle is not between the right and the left, it’s not between conservatives and liberals or Republicans and Democrats.” Rather, “this is a ba

> She said, “This battle is not between the right and the left, it’s not between conservatives and liberals or Republicans and Democrats.” Rather, “this is a battle between Our Lord and the devil,” and every person must choose a side. ... > She said, “If we treat them early – early is the ticket – with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, 80% of the people will not have to go to the hospital.” I was under the impression that neither invermectin or hydroxychloroquine has been demonstrated to be effective. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.18.21252037v1 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.18.21252037v... However you feel about vaccines being foisted on us by the devil, that article looks pretty shaky to me as a source of public health advice.

dave_sullivan 5y ago
> Requiring COVID-19 jabs has become a way to exercise “total control” over people. “They want to force an experimental compound that we really don’t know the long-term effects [of]. Then they want to, on top of that, make sure everyone has a [vaccine] passport. So, it’s total control of a populace. And that’s communism. We’re headed that way,” she said. This gave me a chuckle and did not inspire confidence.
- willmadden 5y ago
  France is on the brink of a revolution over vaccine passports. Police are inspecting peoples' "papers" at restaurants, and there are anti-passport protests with police leading the parade. There are full blown brownshirt squads in Australia. Police are beating protesters in Canada. It's not only reasonable to hypothesize this is about control, to me it's irrational to think otherwise at this point.
willmadden 5y ago
Ivermectin is incredibly effective. It's just not profitable. Here is a meta analysis of 63 (so far) randomized double blind trials: https://ivmmeta.com/ https://ivmmeta.com/
- lucd 5y ago
  Not peer reviewed, not published, anonymous authors. This is a fake meta-analysis. The most important study that weighted in IVM favor was bogus and was retracted some days ago.
  - willmadden 5y ago
    If you don't like the meta analysis, then sample underlying (cited) studies. I have and didn't find any misrepresentations. Ivermectin looks like a great drug to repurpose as an outpatient therapy for COVID-19.
- raphlinus 5y ago
  Here's a scientific paper which presents the case that your link is misleading: https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2021/05/26/bmjebm-2021-111678 https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2021/05/26/bmjebm-2021-111...
  - willmadden 5y ago
    There are direct links to the underlying studies. I've read about a dozen of them randomly, and I didn't find any misrepresentations. Are you claiming that Ivermectin isn't effective as a repurposed outpatient therapy for COVID-19?

dave_sullivan 5y ago

> Requiring COVID-19 jabs has become a way to exercise “total control” over people. “They want to force an experimental compound that we really don’t know the long-term effects [of]. Then they want to, on top of that, make sure everyone has a [vaccine] passport. So, it’s total control of a populace. And that’s communism. We’re headed that way,” she said. This gave me a chuckle and did not inspire confidence.

willmadden 5y ago
France is on the brink of a revolution over vaccine passports. Police are inspecting peoples' "papers" at restaurants, and there are anti-passport protests with police leading the parade. There are full blown brownshirt squads in Australia. Police are beating protesters in Canada. It's not only reasonable to hypothesize this is about control, to me it's irrational to think otherwise at this point.

willmadden 5y ago

Ivermectin is incredibly effective. It's just not profitable. Here is a meta analysis of 63 (so far) randomized double blind trials: https://ivmmeta.com/ https://ivmmeta.com/

lucd 5y ago
Not peer reviewed, not published, anonymous authors. This is a fake meta-analysis. The most important study that weighted in IVM favor was bogus and was retracted some days ago.
- willmadden 5y ago
  If you don't like the meta analysis, then sample underlying (cited) studies. I have and didn't find any misrepresentations. Ivermectin looks like a great drug to repurpose as an outpatient therapy for COVID-19.
raphlinus 5y ago
Here's a scientific paper which presents the case that your link is misleading: https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2021/05/26/bmjebm-2021-111678 https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2021/05/26/bmjebm-2021-111...
- willmadden 5y ago
  There are direct links to the underlying studies. I've read about a dozen of them randomly, and I didn't find any misrepresentations. Are you claiming that Ivermectin isn't effective as a repurposed outpatient therapy for COVID-19?