2 ms·
yeah, and it's sad, because it wasn't something that was unverifiable, it wasn't an "unnamed source"... it was something recorded by many cameras and broadcaste
by ajsnigrutin 5y ago
yeah, and it's sad, because it wasn't something that was unverifiable, it wasn't an "unnamed source"... it was something recorded by many cameras and broadcasted in many places... figuring out it was a lie was a 5 minute process.
How can i trust them then with an "unnamed source" stories, when they lie about stuff recorded on camera?
- jbggyjn 5y agoYou can't, and shouldn't. The people in this thread that still have blind faith in the legacy media are mind boggling to me