> have a policy of firing people after two years and refusing to re-hire them for a set amount of time. However, if they do then that would be immoral for them

> have a policy of firing people after two years and refusing to re-hire them for a set amount of time. However, if they do then that would be immoral for them to. The truth is that no contracting company wants to lost people after two years. Why would any company voluntarily let go of their most experienced workers and go through all the trouble of hiring and training new ones? Who would actually want to perform that cycle over and over again for no possible benefit? They’re not doing this to be evil. They’re doing this to comply with poorly thought out regulations. Blame the regulators for coming up with these arbitrary laws. The contracting companies would definitely be retaining their most experienced contractors if they could.