I agree that "children playing in the pool in the garden" can function as CP when viewed by a sick bastard. But just because material can function as CP doesn't

I agree that "children playing in the pool in the garden" can function as CP when viewed by a sick bastard. But just because material can function as CP doesn't turn it into CSAM. It would never be classified under any of the formal CSAM categories (A1, A2, B1, B2) unless the video included lascivious exhibition, e.g. focus on genitals, sexual touching or posing, or an aroused adult. The definitions are horrifyingly, depressingly, tragically very clear. I did not enjoy reading them.