Of course the top post is misogynistic bullshit accusing her of getting special treatment for her looks, even though the idea is easily disproven by checking ou

Of course the top post is misogynistic bullshit accusing her of getting special treatment for her looks, even though the idea is easily disproven by checking out the other ‘interview” style article on the site, which is two click away and also features a large photo of the subject. It starts with questions about the photo, and the next guy piles on and characterizes the interview as “political, not technical”, because, apparently interviews that require footnotes explaining that “an average PUE is 1.4-2.0, bad PUE is 2.5+“ are just too fluffy for real nerds. (As to the size, which someone invokes to save this accusation, below: both are scaled to the width of the content, only one happens to be landscape while the other is in what’s literally called “portrait” format)