4 ms·
> it is possible that had no-one cried about this change, The “UK porn filter” has already been extended to all sorts of “« extremism online »” (to no effect i
by laurent92 5y ago
> it is possible that had no-one cried about this change,
The “UK porn filter” has already been extended to all sorts of “« extremism online »” (to no effect in the capital of knife attacks, it seems — as usual invasive police rights do not equal a reduction of criminality) and it’s already being proposed to be extended to:
- Online Harms
- Online Safety Bill
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_blocking_in_the_United_Kingdom#Planned_programmes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_blocking_in_the_United_Kin...
- zepto 5y agoRight. My argument against the slippery slope argument is not that governments won’t make demands. It’s that if they do, this technology is irrelevant.