> I imagine rural populations aren't fans either... Not me, anyway. When they were reintroduced it was argued for based on population projections and expected

> I imagine rural populations aren't fans either... Not me, anyway. When they were reintroduced it was argued for based on population projections and expected range. These projections, on which all estimates of negative wolf interactions were based on, were overly optimistic. The real population far exceeded expectations. That was why the law was passed. They've already had their way introducing the wolf to areas here where many people do not want them. So why can't they "compromise" by limiting the wolf population? Even after this cull it is still higher than originally projected.