4 ms·
>Positives get reviewed by humans, at which point false positives are identified and discarded. Let's not forget, this part only happens if you are lucky. You
by silverpepsi 5y ago
>Positives get reviewed by humans, at which point false positives are identified and discarded.
Let's not forget, this part only happens if you are lucky. You get the wrong photo reviewer and you catch your girlfriend with the wrong type of lighting that makes her look as if she could pass for 17 and you're going to have the police show up at your work and cuff you, demanding to know who this person of interest is. Adult males have been tried for possession of CSAM for having images of well-known absolutely above 18 adult video stars: https://reason.com/2010/05/03/porn-star-saves-man-from-incom/ https://reason.com/2010/05/03/porn-star-saves-man-from-incom...
- nl 5y agoBut this isn't from automatic scanning. This is from dumb police work - one could actually argue that the scanning approach would have saved the person from this problem.