4 ms·
I think I just don't get it... The optimized version is actually slower than the normal one... http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110728_KN_1bd8e23bea97037ce5976
by jbk 15y ago
I think I just don't get it... The optimized version is actually slower than the normal one...
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110728_KN_1bd8e23bea97037ce5976777b9732c6a/ http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110728_KN_1bd8e23bea97037c...
I must be missing something obvious...
- niyazpk 15y agoThe same with our website. (http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110728_2Y_cf94015a7345bbedcee24323d6054a58/ http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110728_2Y_cf94015a7345bbed...) 8% faster than Google's version. Yay! To be fair we have done a lot of optimizations on the site, but still feels like I may be missing something obvious.
- andypants 15y agoGetting similar results. I don't really get it, the optimized version takes a few seconds before anything other than my background is displayed. By the time the rest of the 'optimized' site is being rendered, my original site's already loaded. (This is from watching the video in my test results)
- buro9 15y agoI don't think we're the target audience. I suspect the biggest gains will be sites based on proprietary products which may be in quite a state.