3 ms·
Until you need them to rewrite history because it consists of 20 "fix" and "update" commits.
by the8472 5y ago
Until you need them to rewrite history because it consists of 20 "fix" and "update" commits.
- WorldMaker 5y agoThen don't need them to rewrite history? That's kind of on you and your own OCD at that point. If you are making them use a PR workflow anyway, become friends with git options like using --first-parent to shallowly traverse the DAG and let git's tools give you a clean view. (Or use GitHub's PR Squash options, if you really must rewrite history.)
- OJFord 5y agoSomeone that does that isn't going to meaningfully rewrite the history anyway, just squash on merge.